ВІДШКОДУВАННЯ НЕМАТЕРІАЛЬНОЇ ШКОДИ ТА ЇЇ ФІНАНСОВІ НАСЛІДКИ ДЛЯ СТРАХОВОЇ ГАЛУЗІ
Main Article Content
Анотація
У цій статті розглядається визначення відшкодування нематеріальної шкоди в чеському приватному праві, зосереджуючись на впливі реформ Цивільного кодексу 2014 року. У ньому досліджується, як економічні критерії, такі як середня заробітна плата та інфляція, впливають на суми компенсацій, висвітлюючи наслідки для страховиків, судів та фінансової системи. Використовуючи економічний аналіз права, у статті оцінюються такі методи, як теорема Коуза та принципи справедливості, пропонуючи інтеграцію макроекономічних факторів для підвищення точності та справедливості в компенсації. У дослідженні наголошується на необхідності комплексного підходу, який би забезпечував правову визначеність та відповідав сучасним фінансово-кредитним системам. У статті проаналізовано, як створення системи компенсації нематеріальної шкоди здоров'ю може вплинути на фінансові установи, що пропонують неінвестиційні продукти, зокрема страхування, та їхню здатність реагувати на економічні коливання. Це свідчить про те, що законодавство та практика прийняття судових рішень можуть посилювати невизначеність у законодавстві та страхуванні. Це також впливає на ціноутворення страхових продуктів, оскільки зміни відшкодувань залежно від економічних показників можуть впливати на ціни страхування. Неправильно встановлена система компенсацій може призвести до нестабільності в страхових компаніях, наголошуючи на необхідності багаторівневої моделі визначення відшкодування.
Article Details
Посилання
Acciarri, H. A., Delbianco, F., & Ramírez Muñoz de Toro, G. (2023). Gender gap and personal injury compensation: Reverse engineering against judicial opacity. InDret, 1. https://doi.org/10.31009/InDret.2023.i1.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31009/InDret.2023.i1.09
Aivazian, V. A., & Callen, J. L. (2023). The Coase theorem and the empty core: Inspecting the entrails after four decades. International Review of Law and Economics, 73, 106117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106117
Allen, D. W., Berg, C., Davidson, S., & Potts, J. (2022). On Coase and COVID-19. European Journal of Law and Economics, 54(1), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09741-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09741-w
Bahinipati, C. S., & Gupta, A. K. (2022). Methodological challenges in assessing loss and damage from climate-related extreme events and slow onset disasters: Evidence from India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 83, 103418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103418
Black, K., & Skipper, H. D. (2000). Life & Health Insurance (13th ed.). Pearson Education. https://archive.org/details/lifehealthinsura00blac
Bocharov, T. (2021). Is there a “compensation culture” in contemporary Russia? The role of liability insurance, non-pecuniary damages, and legal profession in personal injury litigation. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11(2), 557–589. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1141
Bokwa, K. (2022). Liability for non-material damage in Hungarian law in the 19th–20th centuries in comparison with Austrian and Polish codifications. Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa, 15(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.22.020.15723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/20844131KS.22.020.15723
Brooking, C. G., Fender, B. F., & Fiser, H. L. (2004). Assessing economic damages in personal injury and wrongful death litigation: The state of Mississippi. Journal of Forensic Economics, 17(1), 95–111. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42755970
Calabresi, G. (2008). The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300157970
Carroll, S. J., Kakalik, J. S., Pace, N. M., & Adams, J. L. (1991). No-Fault Approaches to Compensating People Injured in Automobile Accidents. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R4019.html
Chan, F. W. H., Chan, W. S., & Li, J. S. H. (2020). How much is a leg worth in Hong Kong? Proposal for reforming personal injury compensation. Hong Kong Law Journal, 50, 983–1004. https://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/295535
Chunyan, D., & Pei, Z. (2022). An empirical study of pain and suffering awards in Chinese personal injury cases. Hong Kong Law Journal, 52, 1193–1227. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4321668
Ciccone, J. R., Fisher, J., & Jones, J. C. W. (2024). Forensic neuropsychiatric evaluation of a personal injury case. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 42(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2642
Czech National Bank. (2024). Monetary Policy Report – Spring 2024. https://www.cnb.cz/en/monetary-policy/monetary-policy-reports/Monetary-Policy-Report-Spring-2024/
Czech Statistical Office. (n.d.). Average Gross Monthly Wages. https://csu.gov.cz/average-gross-monthly-wages
Czech Statistical Office. (2024). Consumer Price Indices – Inflation. https://csu.gov.cz/produkty/ceska-republika-od-roku-1989-v-cislech-aktualizovano-12-12-2024#03
Doménech-Pascual, G., & Jiménez, J. L. (2024). Changes in damages when liability rules change: An empirical study on compensation for the time spent in pretrial detention. International Review of Law and Economics, 78, 106193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2023.106193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2024.106193
Dorey, D. L., & Rentiers, B. L. (2014). The Calculation of Damages for Bodily Injury Claims. Dolden Wallace Folick LLP. https://Calculation-of-Bodily-Injury-Damages-Paper.pdf
Economic Policy Institute. (2022). Tying minimum-wage increases to inflation will lift up low-wage workers and their families across the country. Economic Policy Institute Blog. https://www.epi.org/blog/tying-minimum-wage-increases-to-inflation-as-12-states-do-will-lift-up-low-wage-workers-and-their-families-across-the-country/
European Court of Human Rights. (n.d.). Simplified Version of the European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/Simplified_Conv_ENG
European Court of Human Rights. (2001). Z and Others v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 29392/95. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?itemid=001-59455
European Court of Human Rights. (2011). V.C. v. Slovakia, Application No. 18968/07. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?itemid=001-107364
Faure, M. G. (2000). Compensation of non-pecuniary loss: An economic perspective. [Unpublished manuscript/Chapter].
Faure, M. G., Visscher, L. T., & Weber, F. (2023). The impact of speed and accuracy in personal injury cases: A law and economics analysis. European Journal of Law Reform, 24(3–4), 318–344. https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR.24.3.325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/EJLR/138723702022024003004
Fikfak, V. (2020). Non-pecuniary damages before the European Court of Human Rights: Forget the victim; it’s all about the state. Leiden Journal of International Law, 33(2), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000035
Flatscher-Thöni, M., Leiter, A. M., & Winner, H. (2013). Pricing damages for pain and suffering in court: The impact of the valuation method. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10(1), 104–119. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jels.12004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12004
Franz, W. W. (1978). A solution to problems arising from inflation when determining damages. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 45(2), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/251684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/251684
Havu, K. A. (2018). Full, adequate and commensurate compensation for damages under EU law: A challenge for national courts? European Law Review, 43(1), 24–46. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323109067_Full_Adequate_and_Commensurate_Compensation_for_Damages_under_EU_Law_A_Challenge_for_National_Courts
ILO. (2022). Global Wage Report 2022–2023. International Labour Organization. https://webapps.ilo.org/digitalguides/en-gb/story/globalwagereport2022-23
IMF. (1998). The Macroeconomic Consequences of Wage Indexation Revisited. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/wp9815.pdf
Ison, T. G. (1968). The Forensic Lottery: A Critique of Tort Liability as a System of Personal Injury Compensation. London: Staples Press. https://mobile.nypl.org/research/research-catalog/bib/hb990035825420203941
Judicial College. (n.d.). The Judicial College Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases. LexisWeb. https://lexisweb.co.uk/sources/the-judicial-studies-board-guidelines
Karapanou, V., & Visscher, L. (2010). Towards a better assessment of pain and suffering damages. Journal of European Tort Law, 1(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl.2010.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/JETL.2010.48
Karner, E. (2006). Geldersatz für ideelle Schäden, Minderung der Ersatzpflicht, Beweislast, Verjährung. In I. Griss, G. Kathrein, & H. Koziol (Eds.), Entwurf eines neuen österreichischen Schadenersatzrechts (Tort and Insurance Law, Vol. 15, pp. 219–242). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-211-30828-8_9
Kianzad, B. (2024). Beyond justice versus efficiency: Reconciling law and economics approaches to fairness. In K. Mathis & A. Tor (Eds.), Law and Economics of Justice: Efficiency, Reciprocity, Meritocracy (pp. 91–130). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56822-0_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56822-0_6
Knetsch, J. (2022). The compensation of non-pecuniary loss in GDPR infringement cases. Journal of European Tort Law, 13(2), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2022-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2022-0008
Krawiecki, S. (2022). Towards a new standard for assessing compensation in cases of collective human rights violations. Harvard International Law Journal, 63(1), 245–277. https://journals.law.harvard.edu/ilj/wp-content/uploads/sites/84/HLI105_crop-2.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Lasák, J. (2022). Towards more flexible Czech corporate law: Revised Corporations Act. European Company Law, 19(4). https://is.muni.cz/publication/2221006/EUCL2022018.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/EUCL2022018
Lazega, R. (2022). The economist and the judge. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 60(2), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.4000/ress.9119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/ress.9119
Li, S. (2023). Compensation for non-material damage under Article 82 GDPR: A review of Case C-300/21. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 30(3), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231208835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X231208835
Lindenbergh, S. D., & van Kippersluis, P. P. M. (2009). Non-pecuniary losses. In M. Faure (Ed.), Tort Law and Economics (pp. 215–227). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/16137/S.D.%20Lindenbergh%20en%20P.M.%20van%20Kippersluis%2C%20Non%20pecuniary%20losses.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Marciano, A., Melcarne, A., & Ramello, G. B. (2020). Justice without romance: The history of the economic analyses of judges’ behavior, 1960–1993. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 42(2), 261–282. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought/article/abs/justice-without-romance-the-history-of-the-economic-analyses-of-judges-behavior-19601993/D960BC61C58B87B0A56438ACB26A1490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383721900052X
Marslev, K., & Sano, H.-O. (2016). The Economy of Human Rights: Exploring Potential Linkages Between Human Rights and Economic Development. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Human Rights. https://www.humanrights.dk/publications/economy-human-rights
Matějková, J., Pavelek, O., & Vítek, B. (2021). The influence of the ius naturale conception of ABGB on the regulation of personality protection and compensation for non-proprietary damage in the Czech Civil Code. Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, 62(3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2021.00329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2021.00329
Numbeo. (2024). Cost of Living Index by City 2024. https://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/
Panchenko, O., Yermakov, Y., Sevruk, V., Pavlenko, S., & Oksin, V. (2024). International experience of compensation for moral damage in labour relations. Social and Legal Studies, 7(4), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals.2024.272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32518/sals4.2024.272
Parziale, A. (2024). How much is enough? Full compensation and the standardisation of non-pecuniary damages. Journal of European Tort Law, 15(3), 264–294. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2024-0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2024-0014
Pavelek, O. (2020). Compensation for Non-Pecuniary Harm to Health and in Cases of Death. Prague: C. H. Beck. https://www.beck.cz/nahrada-nemajetkove-ujmy-na-zdravi-a-pri-usmrceni
Pavelek, O. (2024). The method of determining non-material damage to health and the principles of fairness from the perspective of law and economics analysis. In Proceedings of the SIDE-ISLE Conference 2024. https://www.side-isle.it/conference/2024/paper/the-method-of-determining-non-material-damage-to-health-and-the-principles-of-fairness-from-the-perspective-of-law-and-economics-analysis-567
Pavelek, O., & Adamová, H. (2022). Court of Justice of the European Union on non-material damage. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, 30(3), 547–571. https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/20844/28236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2022-3-3
Pavelek, O., & Zajíčková, D. (2023). Compensation for non-material damage caused to legal entities in the decision-making practice of the CJEU and the ECHR. Juridical Tribune, 13(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/3.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2023/13/3.01
Peeples, R., & Harris, C. T. (2015). What is a life worth in North Carolina: A look at wrongful-death awards. Campbell Law Review, 37, 497–526. https://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/clr/vol37/iss3/8/
Prymak, V., Koreniuk, O., & Poharchenko, T. (2021). Joint functional focus of models of civil liability for damage inflicted on patients. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 393–399. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.47 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.47
Supreme Court of Canada. (1978). Andrews v. Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd. [1978] 2 S.C.R. 229. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1978/1978canlii1/1978canlii1.html
Supreme Court of the Czech Republic. (2011). Judgment of 26 January 2011 (File No. 25 Cdo 5162/2008). Published as No. 85/2011 in the Collection of Judicial Decisions and Opinions (Civil and Commercial Section). https://sbirka.nsoud.cz/rozsirene-vyhledavani-ve-sbirce/
Supreme Court of the Czech Republic. (2013). Resolution of 18 December 2013 (File No. 25 Cdo 2356/2013). https://sbirka.nsoud.cz/rozsirene-vyhledavani-ve-sbirce/
Supreme Court of the Czech Republic. (2017). Resolution of 1 November 2017 (File No. 25 Cdo 2245/2017). Published as No. 7/2019 in the Collection of Judicial Decisions and Opinions. https://sbirka.nsoud.cz/rozsirene-vyhledavani-ve-sbirce/
Šalčius, M., & Herke, C. (2023). Problems regarding compensation for the breach of the right to criminal proceedings within a reasonable time. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 9(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2023.06.008
Sharkey, C. M. (2005). Unintended consequences of medical malpractice damages caps. New York University Law Review, 80(2), 391–512. https://nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-80-number-2/unintended-consequences-of-medical-malpractice-damages-caps/
Sloan, F. A., Bovbjerg, R. R., & Blumstein, J. F. (1989). Valuing life and limb in tort: Scheduling “pain and suffering.” Northwestern University Law Review, 83(4), 908–976. http://guweb2.gonzaga.edu/~dewolf/torts/pdf/83NWULR908.pdf
Steinhilper, G. (2021). Review of the book Schmerzensgeld 2021. Handbuch und Tabellen, by A. Slizyk. Medizinrecht, 39(5). https://medizinrecht.uni-koeln.de/sites/medizinrecht/MedR/Inhalte/2021/MedR_2021-05_Inhalt.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00350-021-5866-2
Sunstein, C. R., Kahneman, D., Schkade, D., & Ritov, I. (2002). Predictably incoherent judgments. San Diego Law Review, 40(4), 1155–1186. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles/8513/
Viscusi, W. K. (1988). Pain and suffering in product liability cases: Systematic compensation or capricious awards? International Review of Law and Economics, 8(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(88)90009-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(88)90006-3
Visscher, L. T. (2012). Time is Money? A Law and Economics approach to “Loss of Time” as non-pecuniary loss (RILE Working Paper No. 2012/01). Erasmus University Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2005715
Visscher, L., & Karapanou, V. (2015). Non-pecuniary losses in the economic analysis of torts. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 3(2), 204–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxv010